The text follows:
Lessons from history not learned by politicians
Brendan Nicholson
THE confused thinking behind
the disastrous Gallipoli campaign persists a century later and was evident in
the military interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Robert O'Neill, one of Australia's most respected
historians, describes in a new book on Gallipoli how "blindness and
miscomprehension" about Turkey's ability to defend itself was repeated in
Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.
In Gallipoli A Ridge Too Far, edited by Ashley Ekins of the
Australian War Memorial, Dr O'Neill says lessons that should have been learned
in the Gallipoli campaign still bedevil current conflicts.
Under Winston Churchill's direction, the Allied nations sent
a potent force to take on what they considered to be an unsophisticated enemy,
but they miscalculated badly.
"Once again, clever people in national capitals had
failed utterly to learn how other armies might be able to defend their own
territory and compensate for their lack of firepower and communications by the
bravery and determination of individual troops, their NCOs and officers,"
Dr O'Neill writes.
And so the troops were ground down by the superior strength
of the Turks, the weather, lack of water and dysentery.
"How strange it is that Winston Churchill, a voracious
student of military history, thought that a force of some 60,000 men, backed by
the Royal Navy, would rapidly induce a Turkish collapse leading to the seizure
and occupation of Constantinople," Dr O'Neill says.
"He saw the Ottoman Empire as moribund. Unfortunately
the Ottoman Empire in 1914 had plenty of fight left in it."
Dr O'Neill says the Allied decision making process was
dominated by Churchill and he quotes Charles Bean's observation on how through
"the fatal power of a young enthusiasm to convince older and slower
brains, the tragedy of Gallipoli was born".
Sadly, he says, this tendency on the part of forceful and
determined political leaders such as Richard Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, is
still with us.
That was manifest in the US-led "shock and awe"
campaign against Saddam Hussein.
Dr O'Neill also notes that at Gallipoli the British built a
significant part of the Turkish defences that destroyed several massive allied
warships. That mistake was repeated when Western nations helped Saddam Hussein
in Iraq wage war against Iran.
"Like Churchill in 1915, our governments need to think
harder about the possible consequences when they give military assistance to
foreign countries," he says.
"More recently we have learned through painful
experience in Vietnam and Iraq, and now in Afghanistan, that such blindness and
miscomprehension is still to be encountered regularly in our own governments
and their agencies.
"The lessons from history's pages are obvious but do we
have politicians who are prepared to take the time necessary, and do the hard
studying, to develop real expertise in the management of international security
policy?
"The experience of the past decade suggests that we are
as far from that goal as were the national leaders of 1914-15."
See the original article at Lessons
from history not learned by politicians.
1 comment:
The initial aim of the landing was to capture the crest of the penisula -high ground -artillery observation etc
Postwar stuff by War Graves found ~ 50 remains in a position on the crest with lots of empty cases – fought to the last round. Done but no backup.
A letter from my great uncle (scout 11 Bn) describing the landing and 1st day suggests that the landing in the wrong position followed by a climb with hand and knees through scrub before dawn under fire destroyed any form of sub-unit cohesion let alone any higher level thing.
Post a Comment